Enjoy!
If you compare the 'Phography->Macro' and the 'Photography->Flowers', you'll see Crusader was right :-)

What thread was this?

Hi Darryl. I think he may be talking about Crusader's idea on the thread "New Galleries to be Added". Below was Crusader's idea and I quote (hope that's okay).

"An easier solution might be to create the flower gallery and keep the macro gallery. All flower photo's go to the flower gallery. The macro gallery can then be used for other images showing only very small parts of something, small items etc."

Ooops... I'm late.. Yes BJ, that's right. What do you think, Darryl?

I think Crusader was right, and thanks for the flowers Gallery,Pierre.

Hey, I was right for a change... LOL

Great new gallery. Now I only have to wait for next spring to add some more flower pictures.

lol Crusader. Pierre, I have just been through the Flowers gallery. There are at least 41 photos of roses. Does this constitute any need for a sub gallery there? Just curious. Thanks.

I don't know if we can create sub-sub galleries... ;-)

okee dokee. ;)

Well, I don't think sub-sub galleries would be needed. It would make the site just a bit more confusing. What I suggest is to ad some keywords to the description of the images. I'm not sure how the search function currently works (I think it compares how many times the specific word occurs in the title & description of an image), but making the search feature more efficient will help people locate an image much easier.

E.g Calling a picture of a rose "Morning Bloom" and not givining it a description like "A rose in the morning", will make it almost impossible for someone to find using the search feature.

i like flowers!

Thanks Pierre for all the funky new galleries;-)

And thanks too all the others in the background.

Agreed with all the others, Pierre. Thank you greatly for all your hard work on the new galleries!

Agree with you,Xentrik.Great and good job!Thank you,Pierre.