Caedes

Feature Bloat / Bug Squash

Discussion Board -> Feature Bloat / Bug Squash -> Image upload handling

Image upload handling

*caedes
11/29/06 9:34 PM GMT
An improved image upload system would only accept the raw uploaded file and save it to the disk (maybe try to make a small thumbnail to ensure that the upload was successful). Later versions of the image could be created as needed when the individual (smaller) image sizes are requested.
0∈ [?]
-caedes

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
.noahnott
11/29/06 11:22 PM GMT
Would this system by any chance be able to accept any size pictures, and any aspect ratio? In other words, it will be just like dslreports dimagery?
0∈ [?]
*caedes
11/29/06 11:37 PM GMT
I would design it with that in mind, but your suggestion would technically be a separate feature addition.
0∈ [?]
-caedes
+Samatar
11/29/06 11:43 PM GMT
I've always thought this was a great idea...
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
::timw4mail
11/30/06 2:22 AM GMT
I don't quite understand what you're saying...we will still be able to upload pngs, gifs, and jpgs, right?
0∈ [?]
"But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness." - 2 Timothy 2:16 (KJV) <- -> Timothy J. Warren | My homepage| My Gallery| My DeviantArt Gallery| AIM: aviat4ion
.noahnott
11/30/06 2:43 AM GMT
I believe caedes is just recommending to himself (this is my edited, interpretted version). ;-)

....basically what we already have just that you can upload any file size (maybe including aspect ratio but who knows). So you can upload 4000x3000px files? (This is how i understood it).

...then instead of having 1600x120; 1280x1024; blah blah blah 800x600...it would be more of a: i wanna 1280x1024 pic for my monitor, thank you, and magically it appears?
0∈ [?]
+Samatar
11/30/06 2:55 AM GMT
I think the only change is that instead of generating lower res images automatically it waits until they are requested at least once and then generates thme. So if noone requests a 800x600 version of a 1600x1200 file it will never be generated, thus saving time and server space.
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
.noahnott
11/30/06 5:18 AM GMT
btw, can you briefly explain what the mods have to do once an image is uploaded? So does the server resize the image automatically, or is it something the mods have to do?
0∈ [?]
+Samatar
11/30/06 5:24 AM GMT
No, we just have to approve it before it appears in the "New" gallery. Basically it's just like clearing PM's. The system automatically creates all the resolutions when it is uploaded (that's what caedes is talking about changing here).
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
.noahnott
11/30/06 5:59 AM GMT
Ah, its clear as brick..i mean glass now.

I like the idea...but maybe it should be the other way around: The images have all the sizes available at first, then archived images only have the full size version, and the other versions upon request? ...i think you already knew that though.
0∈ [?]
+Samatar
11/30/06 6:52 AM GMT
Don't worry, I'm sure he knows what he's doing :-)
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
.noahnott
11/30/06 2:56 PM GMT
...hopefully. ;-)
0∈ [?]

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: