Caedes

Non-art Website Issues

Discussion Board -> Non-art Website Issues -> Me Like

Me Like

.animaniactoo
02/09/07 10:50 PM GMT
The new "Info Box" on the image pages… nice

I know you must be tired now after all that programming… what kind of cookies would you like? 8•P
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
.noahnott
02/09/07 10:58 PM GMT
i also like it.

...one thing, is it possible to add a quick shadow to the image?
0∈ [?]
::J_272004
02/09/07 11:09 PM GMT
I think it looks great...
0∈ [?]
MY GALLERY ........... "Live one day at a time and make it a masterpiece"
::cynlee
02/09/07 11:17 PM GMT
I like it, but I find the avatar just beneath the post a little distracting. Maybe if I understood the logic of why it's there, it wouldn't bother me so much.~~~I guess I'm getting used to it. Now that I think about it, seeing the avatar will make it easier to remember whose image I'm looking at in the VB.
0∈ [?]
You will be led to the knowledge of the internal things which are invisible to you, by the external things which you see before you. . . . Even so then, we can represent to ourselves in thought the Author of all that is, by contemplating and admiring the (visible) things which He has made, and ever brings into being. - Hermes
::Papi11on
02/09/07 11:22 PM GMT
I like the updated layout very much too. The bigger view of the image is most welcome. Well pleased, thank you!!
0∈ [?]
Anne-Marie
.laurengary
02/10/07 12:47 AM GMT
I love the updated layout ! I think it's very professional looking & I really like the description etc beneath the image, personally I find it less intrusive this way. But what's with the funky sizes ?
0∈ [?]
I'm not only weird, but I'm gifted too ! ......CLICK TO SAVE LIVES ! .......MY GALLERY
.margali
02/10/07 1:18 AM GMT
Absolutely agree about the sizes. Frankly, at this point, I couldn't care less about the layout. I can only get the appropriate size of desktop for images that were uploaded at that size (1024x768) which is to say, for very few of them and not generally the ones I'm most interested in looking at.

Hope this is an oversight and quickly fixed. Especially hope it isn't somebody's idea of a "feature"! I can't see the latter, though - the sizes are quite non-standard, aren't they?

- cfr
0∈ [?]
::phasmid
02/10/07 2:51 AM GMT
I'd like to see a 1680x1050 and 1152x864 size. I like the new format on the layout. :)PJ
0∈ [?]
"We consider the artist to be a special sort of person. It is more likely that each of us is a special sort of artist." Elsa Gidlow
.animaniactoo
02/10/07 3:10 AM GMT
I would like to see the gallery arrows come back (I assume that was a glitch?)

and the direct link to artist's gallery as well as their profile. I know it's only one more click to get to their gallery… but I'm lazy, k?
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"
&philcUK
02/10/07 6:12 AM GMT
you cant please all of the people all of the time etc etc
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
.noahnott
02/10/07 6:12 AM GMT
ANyways, it's much better than the last one...
0∈ [?]
&Crusader
02/10/07 6:34 AM GMT
I definitely like the new layout. At least it makes lengthy descriptions much much easier to read.
0∈ [?]
::mimi
02/10/07 7:19 AM GMT
Really cool new layout! Looks spiffy!! Thanks for all the hard work you do for us ;=)
0∈ [?]
~mimi~
::CurtieBear
02/10/07 8:26 AM GMT
Very nice layout, Caedes. With the "Info Box" on the bottom, it leaves more room for the preview image, so you can get mor of a feel for the image portrayed. Excellent. :o)

EDIT:
Looking back at the layout... I think I agree with Noah... O,o
*looks in mirror and slaps self with a dead fish*
I think a slight drop shadow for the preview image would help it to pop from the page.
0∈ [?]
I always try to balance the light with the heavy - a few tears of human spirit in with the sequins and the fringes ~ Bette Midler ~ ~ (My GALLERY, such as it is.) ~ :o)
.isaacp
02/10/07 9:19 AM GMT
resizing every image on the site must hav been fun :P looks real nice, no complaints :-)
0∈ [?]
::Papi11on
02/10/07 2:23 PM GMT
I'm finding the non-standard size of the views a real advantage. As an AOL UK user, I'm stuck with 3 of their toolbars obscuring part of my screen, so clicking on an image now means I see its entire enlargement without any parts missing or needing to be scrolled up or down to.
0∈ [?]
Anne-Marie
.margali
02/10/07 3:50 PM GMT
I actually want to use some of the images as desktops, though, and I don't want to have to download larger files than I need. I do realise such usage might be a bit radical...

- cfr
0∈ [?]
.laurengary
02/11/07 4:05 PM GMT
hopefully they'll get the hinky sizes worked out because I love the new presentation.
0∈ [?]
I'm not only weird, but I'm gifted too ! ......CLICK TO SAVE LIVES ! .......MY GALLERY
.margali
02/11/07 4:43 PM GMT
I seem to have the sizes back now - at least 1024x768, though 800x600 is still missing (as mentioned in the main thread discussing this problem). This is a more minor problem and has only just started, so could be a blip, but now when I load an image full size (1024x768), I get a blank screen with just "Loading" which never resolves to the image itself. If I then right click and choose to view the image "here" then the image loads just fine.

Anyone else seeing this or is it some peculiarity my browser has decided to (just now) start throwing up at me?

Thanks,
cfr
0∈ [?]
::phasmid
02/11/07 5:15 PM GMT
I had that happen to me too, margali, but only once. :)PJ
0∈ [?]
"We consider the artist to be a special sort of person. It is more likely that each of us is a special sort of artist." Elsa Gidlow
.margali
02/11/07 5:24 PM GMT
Interesting. It's happening to me consistently now, though. It started and has continued since - the same for every image.

- cfr
0∈ [?]

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: