Caedes

Photography

Discussion Board -> Photography -> Picture sizes

Picture sizes

::theshrew
03/03/07 12:46 AM GMT
I've noticed a variety of sizes being posted recently and just wondered what sizes are acceptable now?
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
&KEIFER
03/03/07 5:01 PM GMT
it's not really diff sizes being posted .... the site is in a state of transition .. A BIG STATE .. LOT'S OF SCENERY ... and the "math" isn't finalized

until further notice I would continue uploading as usual .. 4:3 ratio .. 1600x1200 preferred
0∈ [?]
*---===>>>>>(¯`·._(¯`·._.: :o) <---- OBLIGATORY SMILEY :._.·´¯)_.·´¯)<<<<<===---*
::theshrew
03/03/07 5:48 PM GMT
Thank you!
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
+ppigeon
03/04/07 10:19 AM GMT
I like the 3:2 ratio. I post now images with 1600x1067 size without problem.
0∈ [?]
-Pierre-
&KEIFER
03/04/07 11:10 AM GMT
And Sam's 1:104 ratio .. or whatever it is (math is not my forté ) ... Flower Field
0∈ [?]
*---===>>>>>(¯`·._(¯`·._.: :o) <---- OBLIGATORY SMILEY :._.·´¯)_.·´¯)<<<<<===---*
::theshrew
03/04/07 11:52 AM GMT
I think the 1600x1067 would suit me better - save cropping or border necessity!
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
+Samatar
03/04/07 11:58 AM GMT
That is the ratio of my photos taken straight off the camera. I think we can now upload pretty much any ratio we wish.
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
::theshrew
03/04/07 1:30 PM GMT
Brilliant!
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
+ppigeon
03/04/07 3:11 PM GMT
Wow! Wonderful!!!
0∈ [?]
-Pierre-
::theshrew
03/04/07 4:02 PM GMT
Now the only thing is to take a really worthy pic... hmmm
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
&philcUK
03/04/07 4:38 PM GMT
just be wary that uploading full size & resolution ‘worthy pics’ as this also makes them more of a viable target for rippers to use in commercial enterprises.....
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
+ppigeon
03/04/07 5:14 PM GMT
Do you think we can upload sizes higher than 1600x... ?
0∈ [?]
-Pierre-
&philcUK
03/04/07 5:16 PM GMT
it would seam so.....
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
::theshrew
03/04/07 5:28 PM GMT
Hmmm!
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
&KEIFER
03/04/07 5:58 PM GMT
yes ... now that we can upload large sizes we must strive to upload smaller ones

:o)

we could become the Tileable Texture Tradinghouse

and and and .. we could have a t-index
0∈ [?]
*---===>>>>>(¯`·._(¯`·._.: :o) <---- OBLIGATORY SMILEY :._.·´¯)_.·´¯)<<<<<===---*
::theshrew
03/04/07 6:55 PM GMT
Would that be t for trash??
0∈ [?]
It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult. Seneca
+ppigeon
03/04/07 9:14 PM GMT
Now I understand Phil's warning above! :-0
I'll begin to sign my works now...
Is it a limit for the file size?
0∈ [?]
-Pierre-

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: