I posted a shot today, vermilion lakes. It was 1600x1064. Now when i look at it it is 1440x900. That is not the same aspect ratio so it is stretched and looks a little funny. Is that a new feature that it is matching my screen resolution, or is it a glitch. I kinda hope its a glitch, because i don't think i want pictures stretched.
I run my screen rez at 1280x1024 and the 1200x798 is "supposed" to be intended for me
it appears to be roughly a 16:10 ratio
my guess is .. the sizes represent an early coding fix that hasn't been repaired .. I only say this because *caedes got rid of the 640x480 size a while back, 800x600 was then the minimum size ... now, essentially, the 640x480 is back
You should have shutup...I thought it was brilliant...I was trying to figure out how to do it...now I know. Maybe I will think you are brilliant some other time then.
I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.
Albert Camus
........
My Gallery
Hi,my name is Rob..ok, so I'm not the greatest at replies and comments. Sorry. For anyone needing to contact me, my email is back up in my profile. >> my cluttered mess of a gallery
The issue is that the site helpfully offers a version of the image at your native screen resolution if your screen is close to the same aspect ratio as the image. This can cause a limited ammount of stretching. There should be no stretching for the other image sizes though.