Caedes

Photography

Discussion Board -> Photography -> Why does no one like architecture?

Why does no one like architecture?

.tahaddi_challenge
05/30/07 5:27 PM GMT
I'm fairly new here, but I've noticed that all the photos that seem to be most reverred on this site are almost ALL of flowers, landscapes, or animals. Architecture, cities, and anything random or different seems to get low ratings.
0∈ [?]
"Jamis fights with either hand."

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
.Mojave_Storm
05/30/07 6:26 PM GMT
I, for one, am actually a big fan of architecture. I guess I really have no clue why there are few photos other than what you mentioned. I never really noticed the lack in arch, though.

Let's get some of these photos going!! Photo team, GO!
0∈ [?]
Watch the weather change.
::animaniactoo
05/30/07 6:44 PM GMT
Architecture is a lot harder to shoot in a manner that really expresses the feel or magnificance of the piece. It's also alot harder to shoot in a manner that makes what most people feel is a good desktop background. Consequently, alot of these images do get tougher marks than others seem to.

What's good to note is that we have a crack team of moderators who do not base their decisions of what's great on the c-index score. 8•)
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"
+Samatar
05/30/07 10:55 PM GMT
Go to the "Photography->Architecture" gallery and sort by c-index.

The main reason there are less images in this category is simply because it's a less popular subject to shoot, probably because more people have access to flowers and landscpaes than interesting architecture or feel more comfortable shooting those subjects.
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
&KEIFER
05/31/07 12:49 AM GMT
shooting architecture is an artform .. IMHO .. it requires more than pointing a camera at a building when your tour bus stops at the burrito shack at 12 noon for lunch

(*i kid, i kid*)

in order to fixate a fanciful facsimile of a facade .. one must plan for light and shadow, perspective, pedestrians, plymouths .. or get lucky

and when pondering the puzzling peculiarities of this site's rating system .. you must ALWAYS factor in the desktop wallpaper gene .. does it make a pleasing backdrop for a computer monitor? .. for YOU? .. for somebody else? .. because that is what brought most members here, a search for wallpapers .. they didn't google for high art
0∈ [?]
*---===>>>>>(¯`·._(¯`·._.: It ain't over till the FAT BABY sings :._.·´¯)_.·´¯)<<<<<===---*
::third_eye
05/31/07 1:10 AM GMT
we have a crack team of moderators? I always wondered what those glass pipes were for ;-)
0∈ [?]
::zorrofox
06/01/07 1:02 AM GMT
I like architecture.
0∈ [?]
+Samatar
06/01/07 9:13 AM GMT
I like traffic lights.



But only when they are green.
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au
.Canuck_Photo_Guy
06/02/07 5:03 PM GMT
I've wondered about the architecture shots not getting as high a rating. Most of mine are high 40's, which is not stellar by any means. But I really like a couple of mine, so, it's more up to individual taste. To be honest, I don't judge my images on how high or low the c-index is anymore. I judge them on the comments and critiques they receive.
0∈ [?]
"To photograph is to hold one's breath, when all faculties converge to capture fleeting reality. It's at that precise moment that mastering an image becomes a great physical and intellectual joy." ~ Henri Cartier-Bresson

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: