find the CoC, or not. Let people have multiple ID's, write abusive, or nasty, or quarrelsome posts. Snapshots? Love em! bring 'em on. is it crooked? better still. I'm done.

Notice the "gratuitous wildlife copulation" line?

I'm going to have to reject your latest upload

:o)

b-b-but they were just like that... part of a group of a dozen or so...:o|

oh well...*sigh*

*takes lumps...grumbles...moves along*

~feet snap together~

~arm raises up high~

Sieg Heil!! Sieg Heil!!

you just called me a Nazi?

I didn't post that because of goofy irreverance that occasionally thumbs it's nose at authority. hell, I'd be a hypocrite if I did.

This was intended for the more serious infractions, and rather than listing occurances, or individuals, I figured I'd post that as a "refresher course" of sorts.

~ojigi~

I meant no disrespect oh wise 先生 !! I's was just havin' fun wit ya Mein Fόhrer!! 8~O

d. Unacceptable subject matter for images such as pornography, nudity, gratuitous wildlife copulation, registered trademarks, copyrighted material, screenshots of games, frames from a movie or television show, and pointless snapshots are not encouraged and may be rejected. Crap, the stuff I post is copyrighted!! Oh, you mean soomeone else's ©!! Got it!!

Hey, what's "troll comments"?? (1f)

Why the "refresher course" Rob ? I'm afraid I don't understand the basis for this thread. Did someone post an image you objected to ? Did you complain to a mod & no one replied yet ?

~both hands on hips~

Yeah!! Wassup wit dat?? ~snaps fingers in air~

Better watch out..he my pull us over and give us a ticket!! Hehehe!!

Deputy: “here ya go sheriff, we found these young hoodlums paintin’ stuff on owd man Wilson’s fence that had previously been painted on old lady Johnson’s fence.”

Sheriff: “hang’em high!!”

Deputy: “but Sheriff, I’s only got’s one bullet!!”

Sheriff: ~slaps hand against forehead~

Lauren, rather than single out a single person, or image, or post, and get into another BS pettiness session, I figured a polite reminder would hopefully send a message to at least some of the intended recipients.

oh and Randy, you should be getting a knock...the knock on your door right about....now >:)

So then this is the Anti-BS pettiness session-BS pettiness session then?

nah. just trying to help get a message across. It seems not to be working, though.

Man im messing with you.

yeah, I got that ;-) just tend to over-answer....it's a habit.

i've been following this thread and am still wondering what has been done around here that has violated the code of conduct.

~unsubscribes from thread~

now would be as good a time as any for someone (anyone) to speak up...and not leave me out in front of the line...again.

on second thought, screw it

I'm just John Q Public here...what the hell was I thinking?

*unsubscribes too*

Dude .. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot .. over?

Post a list, see it missed.
Plain as day, let it stay.

My sympathies.

What an obtuse, waste of a thread......says nothing but purports to. WHAT are you talking about?!-or stop it.....

Derain said: "What an obtuse, waste of a thread......says nothing but purports to..."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bingo.

A) It started out as well intended

B) Why the hell would you revive it over a month later just to say that? Can you tell me what in the world that added to this in a positive manner in ANY WAY?

to answer briefly, the original content was a re-iteration of the CoC, hoping to remind my fellow members of different things which they've seemed to have forgotten. Derain's and Wen's posts contain just the kind of contemptuous attitudes which led me to change the content in disgust.

And really, Wen, for you to call someone else obtuse...now that's irony in it's purest form.

messages like this REALLY make me wonder why some people come here. I'm not usually in the habit of "outing" a person's message to me, but let everyone see the nonsense I was just confronted with.


Personal message from DERAIN [ 19/08/07 23:25 ]:
Who made you the leader, the knower-of-all-things good? .....and, I DO know the meaning of obtuse, as does Wenpeder. Not our problem that anyone coming onto this thread cannot decipher the point: it is not made clearly. Alain

~rubs paddles together~

CLEAR!!

Hey, I just discovered how to get a higher c-index!!! What the hLLL, mine can't get any lower.... post with crooked horizon, with main attraction in dead center, and horizon bisecting image at mid-level... and viola! A 71! Just got that one as a comment request, and this was my comment... Now, I'm gettin' outta Dodge b'fore th' shootin' starts, Mister Dillon! ;-)))

'Critiques of people's work should be constructive and if possible informative and supportive. If you don't like something, say so and then tell how it could be improved.'