Caedes

Photography

Discussion Board -> Photography -> Dodge and Burn for Dummies ... like me. :o)

Dodge and Burn for Dummies ... like me. :o)

.purmusic
11/08/07 6:07 AM GMT
Came across this article. Concise and well laid out in my mind to introduce those not familiar with these tools, what can be accomplished with them.

Limitations, screenshots ... alternate methods are discussed as well.

Go here ... to read about the Dodge and Burn (Tone) Tools.

There are other links on the right hand side to further tutorials.
0∈ [?]
"Sometimes me think what is love, and then me think love is what last cookie is for. Me give up the last cookie for you." - Cookie Monster

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
.Tootles
11/08/07 2:17 PM GMT
Very good - I never thought of it as being something that can help remove the subject from its background. I just tried it on a test image and it works pretty well.
0∈ [?]
::animaniactoo
11/08/07 7:31 PM GMT
Nice find. One of the places I most often use the dodge and burn is in doing touch-ups on faces. It allows you to play with shadows and light to create slightly different contours if you do it right and… the burn can a real lifesaver on irises/redeye.
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"
&trisbert
11/09/07 12:44 AM GMT
That’s a real good article. It explains it so clearly that even I can understand it.
0∈ [?]
There are three colours, Ten digits and seven notes, its what we do with them that’s important. Ruth Ross
&philcUK
11/09/07 2:58 PM GMT
it's a useful tool but can also be very destructive to the data in an image so like many major corrections should be used with caution.
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
::animaniactoo
11/09/07 10:30 PM GMT
*nods* always save an unedited copy… you'll probably want to save many copies along the way with these kinds of tools. Sometimes… I forget that most people haven't been using Photoshop long enough to remember when all editing was destructive. LOL.
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"
&trisbert
11/09/07 10:49 PM GMT
The best idea is to work with raw files because no raw converter allows changes to the original image.
0∈ [?]
There are three colours, Ten digits and seven notes, its what we do with them that’s important. Ruth Ross
::J_272004
11/10/07 2:10 AM GMT
Good article.. even I can understand it.. hehehe
0∈ [?]
MY GALLERY ........... "Live one day at a time and make it a masterpiece"
::animaniactoo
11/10/07 11:53 AM GMT
True Robert, but when you come down to the types of editing this tool is being used for (or any "spot" tool), you've gone beyond the changes that raw editing does. It's entirely possible that someone will come along and correct me, but as far as I know, raw converters only allow global edits.
0∈ [?]
One man sees things and says "why?" - but I dream things that never were and I say "why not?"
&philcUK
11/10/07 1:38 PM GMT
genrally speaking yes but I think the new generations of RAW tools allow for more specific edits too. I'm lookng into Lightzone and the new PhaseOne Capture Pro 4 at the moment that both offer options like this.
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
&trisbert
11/10/07 1:50 PM GMT
Quite so Cat. I probably didn’t express myself well and I was a little off topic. I was thinking of the people who take jpg’s with their camera then edit those same jpg’s. I shudder every time I come across the practice.
0∈ [?]
There are three colours, Ten digits and seven notes, its what we do with them that’s important. Ruth Ross

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: