Caedes is a wallpaper site, but what IS a good wallpaper? I must confess that with most of my images I just try and create a good image (hopefully!) not a good wallpaper.
Should a good wallpaper have space at the sides for the desktop icons? (personally it doesn't bother me). Some people like simple images - do too much colours and too many filters distract users when they view their desktop?
I think a lot of the images on this site are very high quality and I would say that they were 'art'. However, this doesn't necessarily make a good wallpaper. I really like this site precisely because it isn't just full of typical wallpaper images. What do you think?
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell
Yes. Agree. For me, I often choose 'space' photos for wallpapers. Because they are simple and spectacular... Thanks Nasa and Crusader ;-)
But some pictures like 'grasses' of Morat (and others) are 'art' AND superb wallpapers...
There was a similar discussion to this a little while back called "when is a wallpaper not a wallpaper", CaptainHero it may help answer some of your questions if you want to have a look.
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell
Should a good wallpaper have space at the sides for the desktop icons? (personally it doesn't bother me). Some people like simple images - do too much colours and too many filters distract users when they view their desktop?
I think a lot of the images on this site are very high quality and I would say that they were 'art'. However, this doesn't necessarily make a good wallpaper. I really like this site precisely because it isn't just full of typical wallpaper images. What do you think?