Caedes

Desktop Wallpaper, Art, etc.

Discussion Board -> Desktop Wallpaper, Art, etc. -> author list arrangment

author list arrangment

tbhockey
07/31/05 8:16 PM GMT
I recently read somewhere on here that you (you = caedes) arranged the author list gallery in order of the number of images in the permantent gallery, which I think is a reasonable idea. But I was thinking that it might be better to arrange it by the author's average c:index of his images. Just a thought; yey, ney?
0∈ [?]
-tbhockey

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
kjh000
07/31/05 8:42 PM GMT
That has always been the case as I remember it, but I never really cared enough about it to really study the subject. ;) That last addition was just a new "subset" of criteria or how to put it.
0∈ [?]
*caedes
07/31/05 9:12 PM GMT
It is ordered acording to the sum of the square of the c-indexes each times a coefficient dependant on whether it is in the new images gallery or not.

A simple arithmetic mean would not be what I'm looking for since it could be the same for someone with 1 or 100 images. I'm trying to highlight the most high quality and prolific contributors.
0∈ [?]
-caedes
::verenabloo
08/01/05 3:35 AM GMT
I would love to see it by peoples names in alphabetical order...takes forever if ya looking for a specific someone....
0∈ [?]
My part is to improve the present moment.........
co2metal
08/01/05 7:57 AM GMT
yea, that might come in handy, simply an alphebetical list linking to their profile.. not sure how you'd incorporate this though..
0∈ [?]
click here for pure excellence
::verenabloo
08/02/05 2:28 AM GMT
heck, it shouldn't be all that hard..I mean..look at all the stuff these ol' puters do eh??!!
0∈ [?]
My part is to improve the present moment.........
+mayne
08/02/05 3:52 AM GMT
It is very simple to enter the users name in the wallpaper search and voila! No?
0∈ [?]
Darryl
co2metal
08/02/05 10:38 AM GMT
well now that i think about it, there is that list of current and former cadre members.. it would do the job for the most part.
0∈ [?]
click here for pure excellence
::regmar
08/02/05 5:37 PM GMT
Dude! You do too much math.
0∈ [?]
ж Regmar ж

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: