I don't really like it, I find it easier to pass by, but it isn't really a big deal, instead, there could be a border line seperating the comment from the signature.
I think it helps to seperate the comments from the sigs.
I wondered if putting bold on the sig made any difference, but it doesn't. I think it is better this way (though perhaps a little pale). Maybe a horizontal divider or a slightly different colour would be worth experimenting with. How about a limit on length of sigs?
<b>"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell</b>
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell
I really don't like it at all.. It is very dificult for my old eyes to read.. I have always enjoyed reading these quotes. Now I rarely bother, because I have to strain to see them..
The lighter shade is doable, I'm not all that thrilled by it, but c'est la vie. However. This new smaller text is really too small, in my opinion. It's Mickey Mouse size, & I'm not a member of the Magic Kingdom !! Seriously, the new smaller text coupled with the lighter shade makes it just too hard to read & I too, have always enjoyed reading these expressions of members individuality. Now they really are quite a strain to read.
"A piece of toast with butter always lands butter side down, and a cat always lands on its feet. What happens if a piece of toast is tied butter side down to the back of falling cat? Does it hover above the ground in perpetual indecision?"
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell