Actually in the 'Photography' permanent gallery, we find 9808 images with:
..............c-index >= 90:100 -> 229 photos
90:100 > c-index >= 80:100 -> 1280 photos
80:100 > c-index >= 70:100 -> 2397 photos
70:100 > c-index >= 60:100 -> 2508 photos
60:100 > c-index >= 50:100 -> 1804 photos
..............c-index < 50:100 -> 1590 photos
Some thoughts:
1) Like me, I hope you are very impressed by the very high quality of the images here.
2) We see a good c-index repartition. That means that the new voting system works generally fine.
3) If you sort the view by c-index and look by the end (low c-index), you can find some treasures which deserve a higher score... example 1, example 2 4) Please, don't forget the difficulty of the topic. It's easier to take a sunset than a macro or people. It is necessary to think about that when voting.
What do all think of narrowing the Gallery further....almost 10,00 images is too much for a serious person to look through.would take weeks........perhaps the public could vote on say, 100.............ideas?? Prizes???
Philippe: 10000 images... oui, mais réparties dans 38 sous-répertoires d'accès très facile
C'est quand même mieux d'avoir trop de photos que trop peu, non?
Fais l'expérience: choisi un sous-répertoire et télécharge au hasard, ou en fonction des thumbnails, tu découvriras plein de très bonnes photos
Je te rappelle aussi que ceci n'est pas un site professionnel et que tous les organisateurs (modérateurs, ...) agissent comme bénévoles.
ah. merci bien 'tit Pigeon....tu as raison MAIS je pense aussi y a trop des ouevres.on a pas comme d'habitude regarder tous.....moi j'aimerais bien avoir la chance choisir entre moins des toiles......250 at the most!
I was suggesting that there are so many photos that perhaps better to have a top 100 contest and that members vote(prize?)..........Pigeon wrote to remind me this is not a professional site and there many, many choices if one picks a category and that the moderators are being quite generous....i responded saying that is true and i still think a site of 250 at most would be a good idea as.there are just so many photos to look at.....would like to see the BEST-and a contest to choose them.this happens all the time on other sites.why not here? I do not have the time, honestly, to look through so many photos.and I think the sheer number kind of lessens the idea of what is best........I would not want anyone to feel left out.so.Voila! Your thoughts, please.......P.
Noor: for a few months, we don't delete any images in the 'new image gallery'.
The images are:
- moved in the permanent galleries
or
- archived: they are only accessible by the personal gallery from each member
See the New 'Archive' Function Introduced
..............c-index >= 90:100 -> 229 photos
90:100 > c-index >= 80:100 -> 1280 photos
80:100 > c-index >= 70:100 -> 2397 photos
70:100 > c-index >= 60:100 -> 2508 photos
60:100 > c-index >= 50:100 -> 1804 photos
..............c-index < 50:100 -> 1590 photos
Some thoughts:
1) Like me, I hope you are very impressed by the very high quality of the images here.
2) We see a good c-index repartition. That means that the new voting system works generally fine.
3) If you sort the view by c-index and look by the end (low c-index), you can find some treasures which deserve a higher score... example 1, example 2
4) Please, don't forget the difficulty of the topic. It's easier to take a sunset than a macro or people. It is necessary to think about that when voting.
Congrats to all photographers !!! :-)