Caedes
Upload Images
Welcome guest
Log In or Register
User Stats
- 2 total users online
- 37 users active today
- 259160 total members
- +show users online
Elephant Graveyard
Discussion Board -> Elephant Graveyard -> Voting REsults
Voting REsults
.Dante11
06/06/06 4:55 PM GMT
Is it possible to see our reults under new voting system as we could under Selective ?? There used to be a bar graph....I also think it would be good to toss first 0 as it would prevent someone from voting to get revenge, express dislike for person, etc...and No, this does not imply a 10 should be tossed as well......that is faulty logic.
0∈
[?]
Comments
Post a Comment - Subscribe to this discussion
The system already compensates for that sort of thing.
0∈
[?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- rescope.com.au</a
How?? Specifics? There is no bar graph...apparently, it was thought to be useful......it is. I also want to know how an author's work is prevented froim being compromised by another.My suggestion that first zero be tossed is a good one..it is a well-known and used method.
0∈
[?]
Caedes has developed a method to prevent revenge voting and up-voting, but we will not go into it, security by obscurity.
0∈
[?]
The work of art may have a moral effect, but to demand moral purpose from an artist is to make him ruin his work.
(Johann Wolfgang von Goethe - 1832)
To answer a bit more in detail:
The only reason that we don't show the histogram of the votes for c-index is that the c-index is not directly generated from the votes. It would not be clear how the c-index is related to it.
The problem with the zero tossing idea is that there is no statistically valid reason to do it. We have algorithms that contribute to the c-index calculation which take care of lowballing and other flum-dumbery.
The only reason that we don't show the histogram of the votes for c-index is that the c-index is not directly generated from the votes. It would not be clear how the c-index is related to it.
The problem with the zero tossing idea is that there is no statistically valid reason to do it. We have algorithms that contribute to the c-index calculation which take care of lowballing and other flum-dumbery.
0∈
[?]
-caedes