Caedes

  Oh deer  

Click here to view at full resolution.
Uploaded: 01/16/09 3:59 PM GMT
Oh deer
Views: 2036
Dlds: 308
Status: active

At 420mm (300mm x 1.4 ext), ISO 3200. Enjoy!

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
.Catharina1
01/16/09 4:46 PM GMT
Prachtige dieren. Persoonlijk had ik ze beide liever scherp gezien ipv alleen de voorste, daar de achterste je zo mooi aankijkt. Maar dat is een smaak kwestie... mooi plaatje Paul. Great post, Mich.
0∈ [?]
.rozem061
01/16/09 6:21 PM GMT
Professionele fotografie!
Grote klasse, Paul !
John
0∈ [?]
.corngrowth
01/16/09 8:03 PM GMT
As John hit the nail on the head, like to agree with his comment Paul. Excellent post!
Regards, cornelius.
0∈ [?]
Cornelius was here to enjoy your image. Please CLICK HERE to see his work!
::100k_xle
01/16/09 8:37 PM GMT
At 3200 there should be some Noise.
Where's the Noise ? LOL.

Excellent capture and detail for 420mm Paul.

E J
0∈ [?]
This Image GRABBED my EYE. That's Why I Stopped By. Thanks For Sharing ! Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience
::verenabloo
01/17/09 4:50 AM GMT
I love this photo of the deer Paul, but to be honest, the deer in the background, well, his blurryness messes with my eyes way too much. I'd like to see both of them very clearly, not just one. But your camera sure works wonders. So does the photographer. Thank you my dear friend. Verena
0∈ [?]
Go confidently in the direction of your dreams! Live the life you've imagined. As you simplify your life, the laws of the universe will be simpler.
::Paul_Gerritsen
01/17/09 9:20 AM GMT
Thank you for comments!
It's funny to read your comments about the deer in the background, being blurred. I hope you understand that when a focal lenght of 420 mm is used it is technically impossible to get both deer sharp. This photo was technically and artistically intended to have a very shallow depth of focus.
That is a technique you will find everyday when you look into a random magazine. Be it a portrait or a dish of food, you may notice that the photographer actually aims to get a very shallow DOF. The lenses used are often very expensive fixed focals with a very large aperature (f1.4 - f2.8).
If I like it myself? Well, if you look in my gallery you will find both ways. Photo's where everything is razor sharp. And photo's like this one: shallow.
It all depends on the subject. In this case I like the composition, for it doesn't give away the whole picture. There is something for your mind to chew on.
But friends, that is a personal thing and maybe tomorrow I like it the other way! What remains is the challenge: is it possible for the photographer to creat an image like this?
I mean: without blurring it during post processing on a PC.
For your interest: my wife recently published a healt book for which I shot a lot of photos of food dishes. I shot photos of those dishes which were completely sharp. You could actually see what you will be eating. And that is a technique you hardly see these days in magazines. The reactions varied a lot, serious photographers didn't like it but the publisher and the audiance did like it very much. So, who is right and who is wrong?
Thanks for your interest!
Paul
0∈ [?]
If you can't find the words, you may as well shoot it...
.gabriela2006
01/18/09 6:23 PM GMT
I really like it ...it is very professional and the blurred effect looks great:)
0∈ [?]
::Hottrockin
01/21/09 1:01 AM GMT
WOW, that's nice!! A tasty treat I'm sure!?!?

~burp~

8~O
0∈ [?]
Why do the pictures come out square when the lens is round??
.slyyogi
01/22/09 3:54 AM GMT
Sooo nice, love the blurred deer. To me it makes the whole shot.
0∈ [?]

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: