very basic, yet elegant, good 4 a background since u dont want 1 thats too cluttered.

3/5

Did you take this photo yourself?

I'd be very impressed if he took this, although I think this is very doable with an ok telescope. I think that I wouldn't be able to resist adding some fake stars in. :-)

Hey Caedes, I see than you also, you sometimes have letters... I': ha..ha.. :-)

Yeah, I've already fixed that problem. I just have to upload the code patch to the site. :-|

It's gorgeous.

I don't believe he took this picture, if you look from a different angle you can tell it's matted.

This is a very doable shot. I've actually taken very (very) similar shots of the moon with only a 60mm Parks Refractor and my Canon Elph S200. The moon is so bright that you can use default exposure and low shutter-speed settings and get almost a perfect shot without any adaptor or mount or anything. I should post some of mine.

He might not have taken this one (because I do see that it is matted -- just increase the brightness in your favorite image editor), but I wouldn't doubt so easily, having done it myself.

Thanks for this picture, it makes a stunning wallpaper.

I got this picture because my daughter loves the moon. I think she is going to be an astronaut.

nice

I love this wallpapper

effective

Very effective as a wallpaper

not bad, but could be more dramatic in some way

got ot love it ,..makes good back ground!

Actually a waning crescent. Quarter is when it is half.

I would want to know how you took this picture? Because all my moon photograph shots have failed so far, this is a verry nice detailed shot, I gues it is taken through a telescope.

If you took this well done and nice shot!!
if ya dident meh its still a good shot!