John, wederom blij met je post. Vind het jammer van nummer 1. Het waterputje naast de oude huisjes was geweldig. Denk er aan dat zomaar iedereen kan stemmen.. dus de C index kun je niet altijd te serieus nemen. Ik heb de kans niet gehad, maar ik zou zeker hoger gestemd hebben... en verdiend. Dit is een heel prettig plaatje.. Mich.
I've still an image in my personal gallery with a C-index of 17! Will not delete it as, according to the given comments, a lot of people like it. Have to respect however your decision John, but to me you've deleted a real good image. Can't help it that some (snapshot?) photographers didn't recognize its quality. Think it will be valid for this image as well. The composition is good and the image depicts very interesting 'cultural inheritance' to me, but one must have an eye for this. Hope the voters will have it too.
Regards, Cornelius.
This is a dandy shot John. Love how you composed it. I do not look at the C index much. Not everyone, or perhaps anyone (?), has the same taste or views that I have when looking at the various photos and works here. Including my own of course. I put them there in the gallery for others to enjoy as they will. If they are not enjoyed then folks just do not have to look I suppose.
I liked your first post John and I do like this one. I like the composition with the grasses in the forground and the houses are very beautiful. I like the windows and the textures. Very nice work!
Well, I thought the one you deleted was better than this one. We'll have to wait and see what this gets, but knowing the voters on this site, don't hold your breath. Educational none the less.
Momma