I have been thoroughly enjoying your (most recent) postings.
And this one is no exception.
Well done on the notes of composition (a challenge, in and of itself ... given your subject matter/setting) and I do like the post processing you performed.
Caveats?
Minor, at best.
I am thinking that given the portrait orientation that the slight degradation in image quality can be put down to the size/resolution restriction.
You are probably aware of what is to follow, however.. will put it out there.
Shoot in RAW, try.. when able, to use non-destructive editing techniques (Adjustment Layers, for the most part ... and Blending Modes come into play).
That nonsense of mine aside..
Nice one.
And but of course, thank you for sharing your work behind the lens with us.
A beautiful, ornate image. The sepia post processing works well. As a photograph it is very busy. If you are aiming for a FINE ART photograph, you need to get the lens distortion straightened out. I doubt the main column is slanted in this church (or is it?). If not, work on getting all those slanted lines straight. No apologies for the suggestions - this is a critique site, so suggestions are not "nonsense". I have learned so much from ones given me.
And this one is no exception.
Well done on the notes of composition (a challenge, in and of itself ... given your subject matter/setting) and I do like the post processing you performed.
Caveats?
Minor, at best.
I am thinking that given the portrait orientation that the slight degradation in image quality can be put down to the size/resolution restriction.
You are probably aware of what is to follow, however.. will put it out there.
Shoot in RAW, try.. when able, to use non-destructive editing techniques (Adjustment Layers, for the most part ... and Blending Modes come into play).
That nonsense of mine aside..
Nice one.
And but of course, thank you for sharing your work behind the lens with us.