I've been following the discussions about the C-Index and it seems like everyone has a different opinion, which I think is a good thing. I for one am a fan of the index (not that I agree with how they turn out in some cases). However, I am wondering why two of my very very similar shots (Gold Rain and Gold Rain 2) got two very different C-Indexes. I don't much care about the difference in the index, but that would lead me to believe that one is not as good as the other. To my very untrained eye they both seem to have the same quality, etc...so, if anyone could throw me some comments/criticisms that would be great and very helpful.
I've been following the discussions about the C-Index and it seems like everyone has a different opinion, which I think is a good thing. I for one am a fan of the index (not that I agree with how they turn out in some cases). However, I am wondering why two of my very very similar shots (Gold Rain and Gold Rain 2) got two very different C-Indexes. I don't much care about the difference in the index, but that would lead me to believe that one is not as good as the other. To my very untrained eye they both seem to have the same quality, etc...so, if anyone could throw me some comments/criticisms that would be great and very helpful.