I am beginning to wonder if that Photoshop is more and more an armature editing program!
They constantly give it face lifts with out really improving a thing; they constantly say how much better the new version is with out really upgrading it.
When will they give it the ability to except larger amount of ram and catch for the graphics artist who needs to utilize this feature for large image at 600, 1200 and 2400 DPI images with out having errors at the 1.76 ram range and give you the ability to design an image with out walking away while you wait for a render to take effect or and action to follow through.
I am now to the point of completely giving up on Photoshop and sticking with Corel which will accepts almost any amount of ram and catch that you feed it. I am presently in the process of building a server board with two Optiron processors and 12 gigs of ram which out of those 12 gigs 4 gigs will be designated for a scratch drive. I will run this on the window Xp 64 that will recognize up 128 gigs of Ram. Along wih the two monitor graphics card this should prove to be a amassing system.
This will eliminate the need for an image process to have to go to virtual memory on the hard drive. Pulmonary tests show that Corel, Picture Perfect and MGI photo suites run at almost a lighting rate, even Bryce and Carerra 4 run at a surprising speed. But yet Photoshop runs at the same limited rate when rendering. This is very disappointing to me for a professional editing program.
Are there any suggestion that may solve this problem, or another way around producing a larger higher quality image with out large amonts of ram please tell me.
Also if the test proves out show two promise, a freind of mine who is building the system will be going inot building these system for CAd and Graphics artist users. The systems has much promise and as usual the only hold ups are compatable software.
They constantly give it face lifts with out really improving a thing; they constantly say how much better the new version is with out really upgrading it.
When will they give it the ability to except larger amount of ram and catch for the graphics artist who needs to utilize this feature for large image at 600, 1200 and 2400 DPI images with out having errors at the 1.76 ram range and give you the ability to design an image with out walking away while you wait for a render to take effect or and action to follow through.
I am now to the point of completely giving up on Photoshop and sticking with Corel which will accepts almost any amount of ram and catch that you feed it. I am presently in the process of building a server board with two Optiron processors and 12 gigs of ram which out of those 12 gigs 4 gigs will be designated for a scratch drive. I will run this on the window Xp 64 that will recognize up 128 gigs of Ram. Along wih the two monitor graphics card this should prove to be a amassing system.
This will eliminate the need for an image process to have to go to virtual memory on the hard drive. Pulmonary tests show that Corel, Picture Perfect and MGI photo suites run at almost a lighting rate, even Bryce and Carerra 4 run at a surprising speed. But yet Photoshop runs at the same limited rate when rendering. This is very disappointing to me for a professional editing program.
Are there any suggestion that may solve this problem, or another way around producing a larger higher quality image with out large amonts of ram please tell me.
Also if the test proves out show two promise, a freind of mine who is building the system will be going inot building these system for CAd and Graphics artist users. The systems has much promise and as usual the only hold ups are compatable software.