Caedes

Photography

Discussion Board -> Photography -> Colors

Colors

.noahnott
05/08/08 5:54 AM GMT
Yeah, so this photoshop thing is killing me. I've tried every possible color profile option in photoshop, yet my photos still 'lose' color when I view them on the web ... or in Finder ... or when I print. Then when I open them in photoshop, the color comes back to life...

...so ... where's this checkbox that I'm missing?

btw, I'm referring to these photos ... quick edits (that took me a long time); I need to make them more consistent; but after I figure out what looks best (and figure out the answer to the above question).

...and if you were curious, no, those are not all the photos. I'm still weeding through the 10-15gb of images. And yes I shot raw. And no, I didn't really know what I was doing.
0∈ [?]

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
&purmusic
05/08/08 6:15 AM GMT
0∈ [?]
"Think what a better world it would be if we all, the whole world, had cookies and milk about three o'clock every afternoon and then lay down on our blankets for a nap." - Robert Fulghum
&purmusic
05/08/08 6:30 AM GMT
Here are my Color Settings.

Some additional reading ... well, ok ... enough to read in the above 'stuff' ... pop some popcorn, grab a seat and watch this vid.
0∈ [?]
"Think what a better world it would be if we all, the whole world, had cookies and milk about three o'clock every afternoon and then lay down on our blankets for a nap." - Robert Fulghum
+philcUK
05/08/08 9:02 AM GMT
Les is correct - it's all about your profiling and how you convert/use them. sRGB for web / Adobe RGB for print or conversion to 4 colour process. Convert physically alters the colour data to best replicate the same result, assign profile leaves the data intact but adds a compensation curve that visually alters the appearance.
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
&purmusic
05/08/08 1:45 PM GMT
Color Management: Color Space Conversion


From the above, and I quote;

"Perceptual and relative colorimetric rendering are probably the most useful conversion types for digital photography. Each places a different priority on how they render colors within the gamut mismatch region. Relative colorimetric maintains a near exact relationship between in gamut colors, even if this clips out of gamut colors. In contrast, perceptual rendering tries to also preserve some relationship between out of gamut colors, even if this results in inaccuracies for in gamut colors."

More 'stuff' on Color Management found at the bottom of the page, links to two more articles. For example, "Color Management: Color Spaces (Part 2)".

I've found this site to be an excellent resource for all matter of topics.


Any popcorn left? :oD
0∈ [?]
"Think what a better world it would be if we all, the whole world, had cookies and milk about three o'clock every afternoon and then lay down on our blankets for a nap." - Robert Fulghum
+philcUK
05/08/08 2:45 PM GMT
technically, for photography your rendering intent should always be set to perceptual - the others are mainly for colour reproduction in commercial print and can cause banding in particular colour areas on continuous tone images.
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
.noahnott
05/11/08 12:44 AM GMT
slight roadblock .. i need a new copy of photoshop CS3 or lightroom. (New computer; 30day trial is up). Give me some time (looking for a good place to buy with an high school student discount) and then I'll get back to the color dealio...

...but thanks for the help so far! Though, I can't really do anything until I get photoshop again.
0∈ [?]
&purmusic
05/11/08 2:30 AM GMT
Some very nice photos of the wedding Noah. I beg to differ on the point that you didn't know what you were doing.

Your dad was somewhat conspicuously absent from the photos though, save one? I think.

Good luck on the PS front.
0∈ [?]
"Think what a better world it would be if we all, the whole world, had cookies and milk about three o'clock every afternoon and then lay down on our blankets for a nap." - Robert Fulghum
.noahnott
05/11/08 5:30 AM GMT
Somewhere in the 1696 photos, i should. :)
0∈ [?]
+philcUK
05/12/08 6:04 AM GMT
noah - you can buy discounted adobe products direct fom them - they have an education store too.
0∈ [?]
A smart bomb is only as clever as the idiot that tells it what to do
.noahnott
05/12/08 10:57 PM GMT
Oh ... right ... umm ... kind of missed that the first time around.

In any case, I'm not eligible for another 3 months if I go the adobe.com route. :-/
0∈ [?]
+trisbert
05/16/08 12:42 AM GMT
You could go with Photoshop Elements. It has everything that is relevant for the photographer at a fraction of its big brothers price.
0∈ [?]
There are three colours, Ten digits and seven notes, its what we do with them that’s important. Ruth Ross
.noahnott
05/16/08 2:01 PM GMT
I think i can wait ... If i get really really really desperate, i might get elements. I still have 20 days in lighroom...1600 photos ... no problem.
0∈ [?]

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: