Caedes
Upload Images
Welcome guest
Log In or Register
User Stats
- 3 total users online
- 32 users active today
- 259247 total members
- +show users online
Original Swan Lake
© rvdb
(copyright information)
Uploaded: 10/19/11 6:14 PM GMT
Original Swan Lake
Views: 486
Dlds: 16
Status: active
Dlds: 16
Status: active
Gallery:
photography->birds
With regards to my posting Swan Lake. I stated that the picture and I quote “was heavily edited” this was cause for some questions from my friends so kinda figured it was only fair to show the original picture let me know what you think all comments are welcome.
Comments
Post a Comment - Subscribe to this discussion
I think the rework is better as the swans had more natural colours and not so bright.Plus the water had more blue which made the swans stand out more.The swans in this shot are to me too bright,but that just me.Still not a bad photo my friend.
4∈
[?]
Natuurlijk is ook altijd mooi, geldt ook hier Rob. Beiden erg goed ieder in zijn kleursterkte! Gr Mich
2∈
[?]
I like them all, but I like this one best. Could pull down the highlights just a tad.
2∈
[?]
LYTRO. The new light field photography. Refocus your shots AFTER you have taken them. Just click on the word LYTRO. See a VIDEO HERE.
Once again I think that Michael has hit the nail on the head with his eloquent critique. :-)
I'm not sure I would call "Swan Lake" heavily edited" based on this original, Rob. Edited? Yes. Heavily edited? Nope. Now if this shot showed that the swans were really dust bins or Volkswagens, I'd say that Swan lake was heavily edited.
This is a very good starter shot. Your editing added some much needed deeper coloring which made the swans stand out in the first posting. By comparison, this almost looks washed out. This is still a wonderful posting on its own. But you're right. The original Swan lake was better. And at least these birds still haven't lost their heads.
Roger
I'm not sure I would call "Swan Lake" heavily edited" based on this original, Rob. Edited? Yes. Heavily edited? Nope. Now if this shot showed that the swans were really dust bins or Volkswagens, I'd say that Swan lake was heavily edited.
This is a very good starter shot. Your editing added some much needed deeper coloring which made the swans stand out in the first posting. By comparison, this almost looks washed out. This is still a wonderful posting on its own. But you're right. The original Swan lake was better. And at least these birds still haven't lost their heads.
Roger
2∈
[?]
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other.
They both are good, but this one is better in my opinion, more natural which I like.
2∈
[?]
Rob - While both images are good, I like the more natural colors of this one. Thad
2∈
[?]
If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn't need to lug around a camera. ~Lewis Hine The Earth without art is just 'eh'.
Rob I think that this is just as good as the edited version. Well captured my friend. I love the reflections.
2∈
[?]
Billy
...hmmm.All are Beautiful,i agree with Tanju.But this is the best one,Rob.Love it.Faved.
2∈
[?]
I like the deeper colours in the water of the first one. A good base image to work from, Rob. Nicely composed and a lovely watery surface in the scene.
3∈
[?]
The difference between a bad artist and a good one is: the bad artist seems to copy a great deal; the good one really does. ~William Blake
Great lighting & details. Beautifully captured, Rob.
2∈
[?]
"Packers Rock!"
Fan of Karl Klug (DT) ... Tennesse Titans
You have done a good job with all the shots that followed.
TicK
(Viewed Full Screen)