Caedes
Main Galleries
- Abstract
- Caedes
- Computer
- Contests
- B/w challenge
- Breaking rules
- Caedes theme
- Curves
- Draw a frog
- Dreams
- Fall festivities
- Fantasy landscapes
- Food/drink
- Fowl portrait
- Guess the artist 1
- Guess the artist 2
- Guess the artist 3
- Guess the artist 4
- Holiday contest
- Household objects
- In print
- Light and shadow
- Love contest
- Manip contest
- Misc.
- Moving water
- Music
- Nano world
- Nature taking over
- Negative space
- Oxymorons
- Placeholder
- Pop art
- Site design
- Urban life
- Holidays
- Illustrations
- Music
- Photography
- Praetori arbitrio
- Rework
- Space
- Tutorials
Upload Images
Welcome guest
Log In or Register
User Stats
- 0 total users online
- 42 users active today
- 259274 total members
- +show users online
bird food
© timpopelier
(copyright information)
Uploaded: 07/22/07 4:10 PM GMT
bird food
Views: 500
Dlds: 55
Status: active
Dlds: 55
Status: active
Gallery:
Photography->Flowers
As you might have noticed I did put a picture like this already but if you open my old one you can see that this one has been edited by photoshop cs. The reason why I put this picture on is because it is the first picture I've ever edited so I wanted to know from all you people if you think it looks better or not as good as the old one?
Comments
Post a Comment - Subscribe to this discussion
This one is nice but it is not better or worse than the original I think. They're both great! :D
0∈
[?]
Been there, done that, took the picture!
I didn't see the original, so will post my comment w'out comparing them. Love the colour and clarity.
8/10
8/10
0∈
[?]
"Nothing is more exhilarating than pointing out the shortcomings of others".
I like the image. Great wildlife catch with beak in flower. I like how the only thing in focus is the subject and the backround is simply a wash. Really pulls your eyes in quite well.
Please don't be upset, but I actually like the original a little better. Some of the coloring, although is more eye-popping, is not as natural and real looking. So, the edited image does give eye candy, but it also detracts a little because the coloration is too vivid which clues you in that it is a manipulation. Which is of course what you want to avoid in most touch ups.
Don't take this as all negative as that was not my intention. I love the image and I completely understand what you were going for in your re-do. So, don't stop giving it a go.
Please don't be upset, but I actually like the original a little better. Some of the coloring, although is more eye-popping, is not as natural and real looking. So, the edited image does give eye candy, but it also detracts a little because the coloration is too vivid which clues you in that it is a manipulation. Which is of course what you want to avoid in most touch ups.
Don't take this as all negative as that was not my intention. I love the image and I completely understand what you were going for in your re-do. So, don't stop giving it a go.
0∈
[?]
I have looked at them both - this one looks better in the thumbnail but I agree with the above comments in favouring the original one.
It is a very professional looking shot and one to be proud of.
It is a very professional looking shot and one to be proud of.
0∈
[?]
The question is not what you look at, but what you see ~ Marcel Proust
Mark.