I just bought one as a sidekick for my Mavica (which is too big/bulky at times) and for the price I'm pretty impressed. Problem is, most of my pictures are fairly grainy (more so than I would expect). For example look at this stich shot:
http://robert.iseekweb.com/arizonasunset.jpg
Maybe I'm just really anal about it, but I was planning on using it for web development purposes and at high resolutions it looks like it won't work.
I also searched on here and saw this shot (good shot by the way):
http://caedes.net/Zephir.cgi?lib=Caedes::Infopage&image=TH0342-1079494497.jpg
That user appears to have the same 'problem' as me. Am I expecting too much out of the camera? Or do I not have it configured properly.
I gave another attempt yesterday with it (stich effect again) and came up with this shot:
http://robert.iseekweb.com/arizonasunset2.jpg
Settings: ISO: 400 (using a tripod so..), Exposure: 0, White Balance: Auto, Mode: Stitch, Even on P mode with relatively the same settings it's doing this.
http://robert.iseekweb.com/arizonasunset.jpg
Maybe I'm just really anal about it, but I was planning on using it for web development purposes and at high resolutions it looks like it won't work.
I also searched on here and saw this shot (good shot by the way):
http://caedes.net/Zephir.cgi?lib=Caedes::Infopage&image=TH0342-1079494497.jpg
That user appears to have the same 'problem' as me. Am I expecting too much out of the camera? Or do I not have it configured properly.
I gave another attempt yesterday with it (stich effect again) and came up with this shot:
http://robert.iseekweb.com/arizonasunset2.jpg
Settings: ISO: 400 (using a tripod so..), Exposure: 0, White Balance: Auto, Mode: Stitch, Even on P mode with relatively the same settings it's doing this.