I know I risk beign criticized for saying this but I am so disillusioned.
Although I rarely succeed I always strive for excellence with my floral pictures, and have in the past been slightly disappointed when high 70's and 80's have not made the grade. My own self evaluation has over time improved and I have set much higher standards for myself, using the c-index as a helpful guide.
With THIS one I thought I had got close, the comments were encouraging, and the c-index of 88 gave me great hopes for it. It is archived.
If anyone (perhaps even a mod?) can give me some feedback on why it has failed and joined my many other archived pictures then I will be very grateful. I do respect the decisions made, but would like to understand why in this particular case.
Yes, I am disappointed. I do not think I have the ability or talent to produce much better scores than this, my second highest of all my pictures, so perhaps flowers should be off my agenda. Or perhaps just disregard the c-index as an indication of quality?
Thanks to anyone who reads this.
Although I rarely succeed I always strive for excellence with my floral pictures, and have in the past been slightly disappointed when high 70's and 80's have not made the grade. My own self evaluation has over time improved and I have set much higher standards for myself, using the c-index as a helpful guide.
With THIS one I thought I had got close, the comments were encouraging, and the c-index of 88 gave me great hopes for it. It is archived.
If anyone (perhaps even a mod?) can give me some feedback on why it has failed and joined my many other archived pictures then I will be very grateful. I do respect the decisions made, but would like to understand why in this particular case.
Yes, I am disappointed. I do not think I have the ability or talent to produce much better scores than this, my second highest of all my pictures, so perhaps flowers should be off my agenda. Or perhaps just disregard the c-index as an indication of quality?
Thanks to anyone who reads this.