Just occurred to me the other day ... well, not exactly the other other day ... could have been Tuesday. That said, the thought is this:
Looking at the available sizes for downloads of many an image that is being uploaded lately and even in the not too distant past ... are we putting our raw collective pixels to their best use?
Example:
An image available at 2592x1944 is unnecessary and perhaps a resizing or downsampling might add something in terms of clarity and detail.
Not to mention that larger images literally take up more server space on the site here.
And you are making it a feast for the ne'er do wells that might ... might 'rip' (steal) your work. Much easier to turn around and make 'stuff' out of bigger 'stuff', if you understand me here.
Looking at the available sizes for downloads of many an image that is being uploaded lately and even in the not too distant past ... are we putting our raw collective pixels to their best use?
Example:
An image available at 2592x1944 is unnecessary and perhaps a resizing or downsampling might add something in terms of clarity and detail.
Not to mention that larger images literally take up more server space on the site here.
And you are making it a feast for the ne'er do wells that might ... might 'rip' (steal) your work. Much easier to turn around and make 'stuff' out of bigger 'stuff', if you understand me here.
Thoughts?