I commented on a recent uploaded image which IMHO did not went down too well once it was formated to fit inside a 1600x1200 canvas. (BTW, the pic itself is top shelf.) Another member then added that it actually made it a better wallpaper because there are more blank space for icons, which is a good point. However, that got me thinking. I have seen 100's of images so far and some of them certainty are worthy of 9 or 10/10 in terms of originality, creativity, technique and/or artistic merits but do they actually make good wallpapers? How are we "judging" the images? BTW I'm not critical of Caedes.net or us. I just think that this has become a grey area.