The alleged ability directly to know the future without the use of inferences or guesswork. Precognition is a major category of extrasensory perception (ESP). The most common type of precognitive experience, comprising about three-quarters of survey and case reports, is the dream that seems to contain information about events that later occur.
(Leonard George: Alternative Realities, Facts on File, 1995, p. 228)
Some evidence for getting information outside of the locally stored information in our memory can be found in the scientific study of paranormal or psychic phenomena, such as telepathy and precognition. Both faculties of the mind get information from outside of the local realm of the individual mind and the brain.
What are people's views on this as an entity of occurrence as we evolve?
Bear in mind that Hyponoesis (Universal Mind) continuously creates and sustains reality. This reality however is only a potential reality. This potential reality consists of an infinite number of potentialities, out of which Exonoesis (Individual Mind) establishes an actual reality through the act of noetic operations like perception, thinking, comprehension, abstraction, judgment, etc.
Part 2,
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of 'truth': 'conformity with facts, agreement with reality". This definition encapsulates the common-sense theory of truth, the correspondence theory, which claims that a statement is true if it corresponds to the facts. The absolute idealists put forward a coherence theory of truth, in which the only absolute truth is 'the whole' - anything less than that can only aspire to degrees of truth. William James argued for a pragmatic theory of truth (I’m a pragmatist), according to which the problem of truth is one of welfare economics, for a true assertion is one that proves the best for us in the long run. Tarski attempted to avoid the problems of self-reference by claiming that 'truth' can only be defined in a metalanguage.
Is it the case that we cant due to physical limitations absorb and reiterate all the world knows, if so why would we create something that can?
Just some dilemma’s I have been pondering during my surfing recently.
The alleged ability directly to know the future without the use of inferences or guesswork. Precognition is a major category of extrasensory perception (ESP). The most common type of precognitive experience, comprising about three-quarters of survey and case reports, is the dream that seems to contain information about events that later occur.
(Leonard George: Alternative Realities, Facts on File, 1995, p. 228)
Some evidence for getting information outside of the locally stored information in our memory can be found in the scientific study of paranormal or psychic phenomena, such as telepathy and precognition. Both faculties of the mind get information from outside of the local realm of the individual mind and the brain.
What are people's views on this as an entity of occurrence as we evolve?
Bear in mind that Hyponoesis (Universal Mind) continuously creates and sustains reality. This reality however is only a potential reality. This potential reality consists of an infinite number of potentialities, out of which Exonoesis (Individual Mind) establishes an actual reality through the act of noetic operations like perception, thinking, comprehension, abstraction, judgment, etc.
Part 2,
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary’s definition of 'truth': 'conformity with facts, agreement with reality". This definition encapsulates the common-sense theory of truth, the correspondence theory, which claims that a statement is true if it corresponds to the facts. The absolute idealists put forward a coherence theory of truth, in which the only absolute truth is 'the whole' - anything less than that can only aspire to degrees of truth. William James argued for a pragmatic theory of truth (I’m a pragmatist), according to which the problem of truth is one of welfare economics, for a true assertion is one that proves the best for us in the long run. Tarski attempted to avoid the problems of self-reference by claiming that 'truth' can only be defined in a metalanguage.
Is it the case that we cant due to physical limitations absorb and reiterate all the world knows, if so why would we create something that can?
Just some dilemma’s I have been pondering during my surfing recently.
Cheers NiK :)