I'm sorry, but, I'm not getting sumpin'. I posted an image Paper Flowers a while back. Back when puppies where the oldest animal, sorry, that doesn't matter. Anywho it was a little while back. It shows a c-index of 9. It's had 131 views and 109 DL's, yet it's a 9 on the c-index. I know, I know...the ratio doesn't apply to the c-index, but, if that many people have viewed it as well as downloaded it...it just seems like the c-index would be a smidge better.
I know it's sure not a work of art of nuttin', just a simple pic with a PS filter on it. Heck, I don't even know how to 'layer' yet in PS. Need money to buy "PS for Dummies"...please PM me if you'd like to donate to the cause. :)
Anywhy, it just seems strange people view it, DL it and then vote poorly on it. That's just me and my 'lil brain a workin'.
I'm sorry, but, I'm not getting sumpin'. I posted an image Paper Flowers a while back. Back when puppies where the oldest animal, sorry, that doesn't matter. Anywho it was a little while back. It shows a c-index of 9. It's had 131 views and 109 DL's, yet it's a 9 on the c-index. I know, I know...the ratio doesn't apply to the c-index, but, if that many people have viewed it as well as downloaded it...it just seems like the c-index would be a smidge better.
I know it's sure not a work of art of nuttin', just a simple pic with a PS filter on it. Heck, I don't even know how to 'layer' yet in PS. Need money to buy "PS for Dummies"...please PM me if you'd like to donate to the cause. :)
Anywhy, it just seems strange people view it, DL it and then vote poorly on it. That's just me and my 'lil brain a workin'.
Respectfully,
Randy