Well I've just been noticing a few things about voting and the c-index. I'm not critising anything, but this does seem strange to me on the way people vote. For example, my image Risky? has a c-index of 40, while my image Crater Lake has a c-index of 82. Now personally, I think the risky image was better because it was more difficult to take, and just involved more skill. The Crater Lake image was hard to get wrong with scenery like that...so why would it be voted so highly?

Like I said, I am definitely NOT complaining or anything remotely like that, I'm just wondering why votes are like this. Is it because this is a desktop wallpaper site and things are voted for their ability to be wallpaper over their photographic quality?