Actually in the 'Photography' permanent gallery, we find 9808 images with:
..............c-index >= 90:100 -> 229 photos
90:100 > c-index >= 80:100 -> 1280 photos
80:100 > c-index >= 70:100 -> 2397 photos
70:100 > c-index >= 60:100 -> 2508 photos
60:100 > c-index >= 50:100 -> 1804 photos
..............c-index < 50:100 -> 1590 photos
Some thoughts:
1) Like me, I hope you are very impressed by the very high quality of the images here.
2) We see a good c-index repartition. That means that the new voting system works generally fine.
3) If you sort the view by c-index and look by the end (low c-index), you can find some treasures which deserve a higher score... example 1, example 2 4) Please, don't forget the difficulty of the topic. It's easier to take a sunset than a macro or people. It is necessary to think about that when voting.
..............c-index >= 90:100 -> 229 photos
90:100 > c-index >= 80:100 -> 1280 photos
80:100 > c-index >= 70:100 -> 2397 photos
70:100 > c-index >= 60:100 -> 2508 photos
60:100 > c-index >= 50:100 -> 1804 photos
..............c-index < 50:100 -> 1590 photos
Some thoughts:
1) Like me, I hope you are very impressed by the very high quality of the images here.
2) We see a good c-index repartition. That means that the new voting system works generally fine.
3) If you sort the view by c-index and look by the end (low c-index), you can find some treasures which deserve a higher score... example 1, example 2
4) Please, don't forget the difficulty of the topic. It's easier to take a sunset than a macro or people. It is necessary to think about that when voting.
Congrats to all photographers !!! :-)