Quote .. One of the great myths in digital imaging – adopted as gospel by both photographers and editors – is that JPEG images are so inferior to RAW as to make these images unsuitable for professional work. JPEG is different from RAW, that's for sure, and both have their advantages, but to consider JPEG files unsuitable for professional work is simply wrong.
I don't wish to be viewed as the anti-RAW guy .. I'm not .. I would probably shoot RAW if my camera supported it AND I owned stock in SANDISK
the latest memory card I saw was 8 Gigs the size of a postage stamp .. that's just crazy talk .. the first Harddrive (external) I saw was the size of a shoebox and only 20 megs
`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·
Quote .. One of the great myths in digital imaging – adopted as gospel by both photographers and editors – is that JPEG images are so inferior to RAW as to make these images unsuitable for professional work. JPEG is different from RAW, that's for sure, and both have their advantages, but to consider JPEG files unsuitable for professional work is simply wrong.
`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·`·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.·
I don't wish to be viewed as the anti-RAW guy .. I'm not .. I would probably shoot RAW if my camera supported it AND I owned stock in SANDISK
the latest memory card I saw was 8 Gigs the size of a postage stamp .. that's just crazy talk .. the first Harddrive (external) I saw was the size of a shoebox and only 20 megs
but ... back on topic .. Jpeg vs RAW
... discuss (again) .. :o)