"How do I critique a photo?"

From photosig.com FAQs:

"Some people think they don't know enough about photography to write critiques. This isn't true. To write a useful critique, you need only three things:
- a reasonably decent monitor to view the photos
- at least one functioning eye
- a desire to help by writing honestly and constructively

If you like a photo, then say so. Tell the photographer what you like about it. Tell them how it made you feel, or what it made you think about. Very often, the most technically-proficient photographers are the least able to express their feelings about a photo, so people who can do that are particularly valuable critiquers.

If you see something that you don't like about a photo, then say that. You can't be wrong. If you don't like something about a photo then either the photographer intended it to be that way (in which case you simply have a difference of opinion) or the photographer didn't notice it (in which case your critique will be enlightening). If the photo looks dark then say so. Maybe the photographer intended it to be dark, but so what? If you don't like the darkness of it, then probably other people don't as well, and the photographer should be aware of that.

Some things that you may want to consider:

Effort: Has the photographer made full use of the facilities at their disposal? Or, are there things that the photographer could have improved with a little more work? Does it look like the photographer made an extra effort to capture the best possible image under the circumstances, or did they just go with what was in front of them?

Color: Was the photographer's choice to use or not use color sound? If they used colour, does the colour contribute to the image, or would it have been more effective in b&w? If its b&w, does that help to focus on the essentials of the image, or are we missing something important? This will always be a subjective judgement, of course, but hearing other people's opinions on this is often useful.

Spatial positioning and composition: Please, please, please do NOT just spout standard photographic guidelines as if they were the law! The rule of thirds, for example, is not an instruction handed down from the gods - it is a handy guideline to what will often work well. For some photos, a centred composition will be perfect and using the rule of thirds would ruin it. So think about what works in this case. Does anything look squeezed up against the side of the frame? Are there big open spaces around the edges that could be cropped out? Is there a clear subject that occupies the majority of the frame, or is the subject unclear or small and surrounded by irrelevant material?

Direction of attention: What do you see first in the photo? Is it the right thing? Do you have to hunt for the subject or does it stand out? Is your eye drawn to objects in the background, rather than the subject, or do you look to the edge of the frame, expecting to find something that isn't there?

Focus: Is anything in focus? Is it the subject or something else? Is the depth of field appropriate? Is the subject contained within the depth of field or are parts of the subject fuzzy? Are there distracting elements in the background that are in focus which would have been blurred out by a wider aperture? As with composition, remember that there are no fixed rules. Think about what works or doesn't work in the case of this particular photo.

Exposure: Is the photo properly exposed? Are there details both in the highlights and in the shadows, or are there large "blown-out" highlight areas or "blocked-up" shadow areas? Again, blown highlights are not necessarily wrong. If you look at sunlight reflected in a glass window, what the eye will see is a white area, so there is no reason at all why a photo shouldn't show the same thing. Sometimes blown highlights can be used to good artistic effect. As always, don't parrot rules, think about how well things work in this photo. If the exposure is biased towards light (high key) or dark (low key), did the photographer make a good choice?"


/\ Simply some more 'constructive food for thought' ... when commenting on images. :o)

"How do I critique a photo?" should be changed to "How do I critique an artistic image?"

I'm glad to read the one about blown highlights. :) They can often ruin the picture, but sometimes they are the only thing that gives it its atmosphere.

Invaluable reminders. Not just for viewing other works but also for assessing what others may see. Especially helpful when I find myself at a loss of words...: )

"How do I critique a photo?" should be changed to "How do I critique an artistic image?"

Well, there's that ...

(*reminds self to be open and accepting of 'constructive criticism' ...*)

:oP


Good good point, tbob ... as this is a quoted piece/article ... I didn't change anything. However, had the same thought. As this information could be easily and readily applied to any image or genre.

Annnnd ...

It is a good good check and balance for those that wish to read through and incorporate the stuff contained therein, when viewing their own prospective uploads prior to posting. :o)

** decides that trying to sprinkle a little salt into an ocean of treacle is ultimately a pointless exercise... **