Caedes

Feature Bloat / Bug Squash

Discussion Board -> Feature Bloat / Bug Squash -> Most Active Members

Most Active Members

::casechaser
02/08/11 3:12 PM GMT
The most active members on Caedes are ranked by their participation using the numbers generated by their “Comments,” their “Votes,” and their “Uploads.” And, this is fine in evaluating what the member has done, for his/her rank as active.

But I was wondering if the “Most Active Members” should also be reflective of other, “over and above” activities too. Maybe, have a combination of the personal achievements along with contributions made for the betterment of the site too. For example, “contributions to the discussion boards; nominations made to the AC; his/her work accepted to the Main Gallery; participation in the contests as a contributor, as a voter, as a winner; and selection as Artist of the Month.

These categories can highlight an activity made by our artists over a much longer time period. Thus, a compiled list of artists, who, through their actions, illustrate a higher set of standards and practices, for the continuation and advancement of the site.

I am sure, with more thought and attention given to this idea, more topics may be used as measurement tools and could be added to the list. And ones submitted above may be dropped. But, my thought here is to consider a concept which will give credit to those working in the best interest of the site and to encourage others to join in by showing them the connection of these categories with the elevation and growth of the site
0∈ [?]

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
::coram9
02/08/11 6:41 PM GMT
Unfortunately, the current system, and that proposed, take no notice of the quality of the comments or forum posts. Lots of 'that's a nice picture' type comments that do little, still count towards the accolade of the most active member. Someone who makes 3 detailed constructive criticisms would, I suppose, get less points than someone who made lots of bland criticisms. The same will apply to voting, even if votes are cast for bad images, nominations of unsuitable images to the AC etc. Automating such a system to show real quality of participation would, I think, be very difficult, and without it the meaning would be worth less than the current one.
1∈ [?]
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." Ansel Adams - Please look at other images in my Gallery.
*caedes
02/08/11 10:25 PM GMT
Good point Coram. This is the main reason that the "Most active members" list is only a list and is not used for any other purpose.
0∈ [?]
-caedes

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: