Caedes

Photography

Discussion Board -> Photography -> Your photography is too professional

Your photography is too professional

*caedes
06/18/05 3:55 AM GMT
I think that we've discussed this issue before: Walmart refusing to print good photos. Judging from the quality of the photo that was rejected in the story I'm guess that most of the photos here would be rejected as well.

Question: What can possibly serve as proof of ownership of a digital photo?
0∈ [?]
-caedes

Comments

Post a Comment  -  Subscribe to this discussion
d_spin_9
06/18/05 5:07 AM GMT
the raw files would serve as reasonable proof, most cameras that would have a 'high quality' issue better be able to make raw pictures, and i think most photographers shooting something that is risking on the too good side would probably shoot raw in that situation, and i havent ever seen any ways of turning an 8-bit-compressed jpg into a 12-bit-raw file, and no discerning pro photographer would give out his raw files
0∈ [?]
The heavens declare the glory of God, the skies proclaim the work of His hands.
prismmagic
06/19/05 7:15 AM GMT
I'm sorry I think this is halariuos. Who gives a darn if it is pro or amateur or not. they get paid do they not? They should follow a ethics code as all other developers. If its not your don't print it with out permision.
0∈ [?]
+mayne
06/19/05 1:24 PM GMT
Exif data? Take the camera in with you and let them watch you pull the card out. It may be that you just uploaded images to the card with another device, but at least it is a little more convincing. I have found that Walmart is overpriced compared to other photofinishing stores. So, have a look elsewhere instead of being drawn there by the low price advertising:-)
0∈ [?]
Darryl
Jeffo
06/19/05 11:08 PM GMT
ok i know on my camera (cant speak for all) it keeps a memory of all of the settings and title of photo that could serve as proof since i have mine set numerically such as
DSCN2572
DSCN2573
so if you were to have that photo log with the original titled photo it may work

however i prefer to have my prints done at somewhere better because my walmart does a horrible job... i actually prefer price club the most as you load the images on their computers and it sends to their printers without the clerk working inbetween but they could still reprint i guess... if you really want to be safe about it take it home load it in photoshop and sign some sort of a tag on the photo then go have it printed
0∈ [?]
My brush is a welder and my canvas is a peice of metal.
+Samatar
06/20/05 12:33 AM GMT
Well, the answer to this problem is clear. If you want to print a photo there, just choose the really bad ones.
0∈ [?]
-Everyone is entitled to my opinion- Visit the new improved rescope.com.au
::dreamer100
06/20/05 10:04 AM GMT
I'll have to start putting myself in every shot. Prepare for a lot of extended arm self portraits. Seriously, this could be a trend that other chains will pick up.
0∈ [?]
::philcUK
06/20/05 2:46 PM GMT
or you could sell a vital organ or two and buy a fuji pictography mini lab, do it your self and give Walmart the bird. (a bit pricey but a small organ should cover it....)
0∈ [?]
"Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps"
::philcUK
06/20/05 2:50 PM GMT
$3500 for the Pictography 3500 (any print upto A3) which is almost twice as cheap as it is here in the UK - worth a cornea any time of the day :-)
0∈ [?]
"Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps"

Leave a comment (registration required):

Subject: