Most certainly caught my eye, with respect to your use of negative space and the repetitive forms of the structures and lighting.
Good detail and clarity of the houses.
Composition.
Might be the one real lone caveat. Undecided if having the light source on the outer frame/border (right-hand side) is a plus or not. And this said, without the benefit of having been there.
Would be my personal preference to have the camera position/perspective to have been moved slightly, such that there is more inclusion within frame. And not so tightly up against.
Putting my feet further into my mouth (er, fingers? :oP) ... the central placement of your focal subjects (not quite as there is more room at the bottom, than that at the top). Had to take your image here in some more on this point. And again, undecided if your photo would work better shifting everything down some.
Perhaps it may be the end point of the light source that 'streaks' a bit ... ending where it does and within frame ... and it's placement, that is my sticking point.
Thought being, if the last light off to the left (to keep it simple here (simple? ... I don't do well :oP) were lower and shifted to the right more so to end up on the third of thirds intersecting point ... might create more visual dynamics.
On a lesser note ... some camera shake ... light to the far left, and on that note ... shutter release cable? And then something I read; tying a 'knot' in the release cable to further minimize the chance of any shake.
That nonsense of mine aside. Well done on the technical considerations for such a challenging shot.
Dark? More ... please. :o)
And but of course, thank you for sharing this one with us. :o)